Pascal and Me. (Warning: Soapbox!)

Philosophy was always my favorite subject in High School and College. I loved all the logic and the way you could argue your points and be right. If only life were like my philosophy class! I try that with Ben and I can be “right” but still very wrong.

My favorite philosopher was Blaise Pascal and I didn’t know until this year that he was a Christian Philosopher when I discovered he wrote one of my favorite quotes. “There is a God shaped vacuum in the heart of every man which cannot be filled by any created thing, but only by God, the Creator, made known through Jesus” which I used in another blog. His logic was so practical to me that it helped shape my whole belief system. I had studied other religions to help define my own, and separate my faith from my parents’. Pascal’s Wager is basically this: (copied from wikipedia so I didn’t butcher it too much, it’s been awhile since college philosophy!)

-You live as though God exists.
-If God exists, you go to heaven: your gain is infinite.
-If God does not exist, you gain nothing and lose nothing.
-You live as though God does not exist.
-If God exists, the text is unspecified, but it could be implied that you go
to limbo, purgatory, or hell: your loss is either null or infinite.
-If God does not exist, you gain nothing and lose nothing.

On the other side the Atheist’s Wager suggests that:

“You should live your life and try to make the world a better place for your being in it, whether or not you believe in God. If there is no God, you have lost nothing and will be remembered fondly by those you left behind. If there is a benevolent God, he may judge you on your merits coupled with your commitments, and not just on whether or not you believed in him.”

I don’t claim to be a philosopher at all, it just seems to me, if someone was looking at the two wagers that Pascals’ would still win out! I’d rather have eternal life and be considered a fool than have been a fool for not accepting the simple truth. C. S. Lewis also summarized it: “Christianity, if false, is of no importance, and if true, is of infinite importance. The only thing it cannot be is moderately important.” One thing to mention is that Pascal’s Wager is just a starting off point, Google his name and read more of his writings, they are very interesting and insightful.

It seems the biggest critics of faith are people who can’t grasp the humble nature of God- that an all powerful God would send his son to die, then be raised, and all they have to do is believe in that. It’s just too easy… it’s easier to think of reasons he doesn’t exist, than reasons that he does. I read this book Love the Lord Your God with all Your Mind, and it said how for centuries the church was the intellect of the world. Hard to believe now, people who are believers in God are now considered ignorant, and honestly that has become more and more true. To say you believe something, “just because” is ignorant. While I believe that “Faith like a Child” is great, it’s no excuse for laziness is striving to understand WHO God is. When people think of a Christian… people like that lady from Wife-Swap are what come to mind! I am NOT like that. I doubt the authenticity of people like that actually. It’s so showy… and crazy. That is not who Jesus was. If we are to be like Christ, then we need to at minimum carry the faith with some dignity… that’s all, I could go on and on… but I have a life…

  • Amanda

    Okay. I’m probably going to get hit pretty hard here, but here it goes…

    If you believe in God because it’s safer, then I would reason that you do not fully believe in God at all. Belief in God, to me, means believing no matter what. What if the consequences of believing in God were that you had to go to hell? Very few would believe in Him. If you say that I am a Christian because it’s “okay,” then I would say that you are actually agreeing with both Pascal and the atheists.

    I don’t think that I’ve ever had reason to doubt C.S. Lewis, but your quote (which you should never take things out of context – so my bad) shows me that he believed in the safety of Christianity.

    I think that you have to accept God with your whole heart because even though science has a reason that wind happens, you trust that it is truly God. Not the naive kind of child trust, but because you know in your heart that God is present in everything.

  • The Clarks

    Excellent point! no, I agree with you, I am just presenting another side. I was already a Christian when I started reading his writings and when you are in High School everything you have believed up to that point is called into question by your teachers. Reading Pascal, at that time, was helpful in concreting what I already knew in my heart was true. If you read MORE of Pascal he goes into detail which has to do with the heart more than the head. Thanks for the comment!